<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Lens Debate &#8211; Canon 500mm, 600mm or 800mm?</title> <atom:link href="http://photographyminute.com/lens-debate-canon-500mm-600mm-or-800mm.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://photographyminute.com/lens-debate-canon-500mm-600mm-or-800mm.htm</link> <description>Sharing photos, reviews and tips for photographers</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Rogue Woman</title><link>http://photographyminute.com/lens-debate-canon-500mm-600mm-or-800mm.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3021</link> <dc:creator>Rogue Woman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:42:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://onefourphotography.com/?p=792#comment-3021</guid> <description>I have the 100-400 lens and was debating in the same boat as you; the 400,500 or 600. In the end i am going with the 500mm. The ease of mobility and cost being my two top requirements after the fact that I refuse to not get a L lens. So if you want my vote the 500 is the way to go. Getting the 400 does not make sence, you already have that with the 100-400, not prime I know but you need that extra reach. I already bought the 2x teleconverter and the gitzo tripod and whimberly head. Now to save save save.
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theroguewoman.com/2010/04/camera-gear-2x-tele-converter.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Camera Gear - The 2x Tele-converter&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 100-400 lens and was debating in the same boat as you; the 400,500 or 600. In the end i am going with the 500mm. The ease of mobility and cost being my two top requirements after the fact that I refuse to not get a L lens. So if you want my vote the 500 is the way to go. Getting the 400 does not make sence, you already have that with the 100-400, not prime I know but you need that extra reach. I already bought the 2x teleconverter and the gitzo tripod and whimberly head. Now to save save save.<br
/> My recent post <a
href="http://www.theroguewoman.com/2010/04/camera-gear-2x-tele-converter.html" target="_blank">Camera Gear &#8211; The 2x Tele-converter</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
